Message172939
| Author |
jcea |
| Recipients |
btubbs, jcea, pitrou, pje |
| Date |
2012年10月15日.02:30:36 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1350268237.43.0.893794690171.issue16220@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Your patch is trivial enough, I am OK to integrate it as is, but it would be nice to verify that we are not reintroducing this bug in the future.
I know that writing a the test will be far more difficult that writing the patch. You can try :).
Anyway I am OK to integrate current patch as is. Looks simple enough.
The comment in "run()" is a bit scary, and we could call "self.close()" twice, with this patch, or call extra code after "self.close()" is called. I don't know it that would be an issue, I am not familiarized enough with WSGI. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年10月15日 02:30:37 | jcea | set | recipients:
+ jcea, pje, pitrou, btubbs |
| 2012年10月15日 02:30:37 | jcea | set | messageid: <1350268237.43.0.893794690171.issue16220@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年10月15日 02:30:37 | jcea | link | issue16220 messages |
| 2012年10月15日 02:30:36 | jcea | create |
|