Message172448
| Author |
orsenthil |
| Recipients |
Jorge.Gomes, eric.smith, gregory.p.smith, orsenthil |
| Date |
2012年10月09日.05:30:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1349760638.73.0.0503880262008.issue16134@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Personally, I want to do away with all those scheme specific stuff, if we can. I have tried previously, but failed due to some backwards incompatibility. 3.4 gives a good chance/time to make those changes to get rid of those scheme specific stuff (again).
So, instead of adding the rmtp* modules to the various categories, I would like to see if can find a way out.
issue9374 - another related one which.
Also, Jorge Gomes: If you care about 2.7 version only, then the way I have seen this issue being handled in production is you extend the uses_relative list with the protocols that you want to support.
Like
>>> from urlparse import uses_netloc
>>> uses_netloc.extend(['rtmp','rtmpe'])
2.7.x is in bugfix mode and this change may not be considered a bug-fix to find it's place in 2.7.x |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年10月09日 05:30:38 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, gregory.p.smith, eric.smith, Jorge.Gomes |
| 2012年10月09日 05:30:38 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1349760638.73.0.0503880262008.issue16134@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年10月09日 05:30:38 | orsenthil | link | issue16134 messages |
| 2012年10月09日 05:30:38 | orsenthil | create |
|