Message172401
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年10月08日.18:50:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<201210082150.01041.storchaka@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1349721131.22.0.838179650467.issue16166@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Ouch, sounds confusing. I would rather have PY_LITTLE_ENDIAN defined only
> on little-endian machines and PY_BIG_ENDIAN only on big-endian machines.
> (and PY_BYTE_ORDER isn't necessary)
Why use two complementary boolean variables for a single boolean value (Python
does not support mixed endian in any case)? There is WORDS_BIGENDIAN already. |
|