Message171882
| Author |
jcea |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, jcea |
| Date |
2012年10月03日.13:28:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1349270901.78.0.383298518198.issue16113@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
We have MD5, SHA1, sha256, sha512 implemented, to use when openssl is not available. Can we do the same with sha-3?. I would suggest to adopt the reference implementation without extensive optimizations, since we will have them when openssl has them.
So we might implement SHA-3 now and integrate OpenSSL implementation later, when available. This is interesting, for instance, because many users of Python 3.4 will have a non "up to date" OpenSSL system library. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年10月03日 13:28:21 | jcea | set | recipients:
+ jcea, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti |
| 2012年10月03日 13:28:21 | jcea | set | messageid: <1349270901.78.0.383298518198.issue16113@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年10月03日 13:28:21 | jcea | link | issue16113 messages |
| 2012年10月03日 13:28:21 | jcea | create |
|