Message171808
| Author |
vinay.sajip |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, ncoghlan, python-dev, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2012年10月02日.15:07:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1349190467.26.0.405110483428.issue15452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I've updated logging as discussed in this issue, except for the removal of the two calls to eval() in logging.config. I propose to resolve that as follows:
1. Add the Evaluator implemented in the Gist I linked to to ast.py.
2. Expose a function 'ast.lookup_eval(source, context, allow_import)' which basically just does a
return Evaluator(context, allow_import).evaluate(source, '<lookup_eval>')
3. Add docs and tests to ast.rst and test_ast.py.
4. Update logging.config to call ast.lookup_eval() instead of eval().
Please comment if you see any problems with this, otherwise I will go
ahead and implement this change within the next week or so. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年10月02日 15:07:47 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, ncoghlan, Arfrever, python-dev |
| 2012年10月02日 15:07:47 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1349190467.26.0.405110483428.issue15452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年10月02日 15:07:47 | vinay.sajip | link | issue15452 messages |
| 2012年10月02日 15:07:46 | vinay.sajip | create |
|