Message171393
| Author |
chris.jerdonek |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, cvrebert, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, tshepang |
| Date |
2012年09月27日.21:25:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1348781133.38.0.68789813977.issue16036@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Attaching updated patch that clarifies the accepted non-numeric types as Serhiy suggested on Rietveld.
I also made a few other changes like linking to "integer literal" and updating the "base-radix" reference. As I began to suspect, the latter was left over from a prior version of the docs (when the keyword argument was named "radix"):
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/18db8c4d4487/Doc/library/functions.rst#l559
I will commit later today unless there are further suggestions. |
|