Message171007
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, eric.smith, larry, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, pitrou, rhettinger, sdaoden, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach, vstinner, xuanji |
| Date |
2012年09月22日.16:51:09 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<201209221950.56855.storchaka@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1348312272.02.0.520132325248.issue10044@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I recommend to close the issue as rejected.
I think _PyLong_IS_SMALL_INT can be rewritten in a safe style. For example, using a checking of several fields ((sdigit)(x)->ob_digit[0] < _MAX_SMALL_INT && PySIZE(x) <= 1) or a
special flag. It is possible however that shuch checking will fully destroy the effect of optimization. We need further research. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月22日 16:51:10 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, loewis, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, larry, eric.smith, stutzbach, asvetlov, meador.inge, xuanji, sdaoden |
| 2012年09月22日 16:51:10 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue10044 messages |
| 2012年09月22日 16:51:09 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|