Message170826
| Author |
Julian |
| Recipients |
Julian |
| Date |
2012年09月20日.18:43:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1348166637.22.0.281544835659.issue15987@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
As is, as far as I can tell, there's no way to easily compare two AST nodes to see if they have the same children and same fields (recursively).
I'm writing some unit tests for a NodeTransformers, so I've settled for comparing `ast.dump()`s of each, which is kind of dirty, but 1) works and 2) produces reasonable failure messages. (As a side note of what else I've tried, comparing, say, a list of the `iter_child_nodes` is not a good alternative, since the tests I'm writing are making assertions that a given node was not modified, which means they deepcopy the node and then want to assert that the "transformed" node is unchanged.)
I don't know the global implications of changing ast.AST.__eq__ to know if that's feasible (hopefully someone will comment on that), but if it isn't, another provided way would be nice. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月20日 18:43:57 | Julian | set | recipients:
+ Julian |
| 2012年09月20日 18:43:57 | Julian | set | messageid: <1348166637.22.0.281544835659.issue15987@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月20日 18:43:56 | Julian | link | issue15987 messages |
| 2012年09月20日 18:43:56 | Julian | create |
|