Message170775
| Author |
chris.jerdonek |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, rhettinger, sandro.tosi |
| Date |
2012年09月19日.22:31:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1348093884.98.0.888176029872.issue10967@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
One important piece is that regrtest currently has no tests (e.g. there is no test_regrtest.py), so changing it must be done more carefully. How do people feel about new (or newly modified) regrtest classes and functions going into a different fully-tested module with its own test_* file. Currently, regrtest is a mixture of definitions and "running code," so I would be leery of adding test_regrtest.
This could also be done by making regrtest a package, so that regrtest-related modules would be in a single directory. |
|