Message170716
| Author |
michael.foord |
| Recipients |
Julian, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, pablomouzo, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2012年09月19日.09:32:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1348047126.6.0.854690363841.issue11664@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It maybe that patch.object is a more natural interface to the small sample of people commenting here, in which case great - that's what it's there for.
However in common usage patch is used around two orders of magnitude more. I've seen large codebases with hundreds of uses of patch and only a handful of uses of patch.object.
To support the *minor* use case and not the major use case in TestCase would be an inanity. |
|