Message170695
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, techtonik |
| Date |
2012年09月19日.01:49:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1348019359.39.0.196860534718.issue8996@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think I'm -1 on this, for the following reasons:
* it's less explicit;
* it gives you less control (I'm thinking e.g. at the () added by :func:/:meth: but not :class:, so that :func:`int` and :class:`int` are rendered in different ways);
* even though this might have been OK if we used it from the beginning, now we are using specific roles everywhere, and changing them will either result in a mass update or in a mixed style -- none of which are desirable;
* if the mass update is done and later on we change our mind, it's difficult to switch back from `...` to :role:`...`.
Disabling `...` sounds OK to me (I don't think we have many left, if any). |
|