Message170647
| Author |
vinay.sajip |
| Recipients |
ncoghlan, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2012年09月18日.14:49:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1347979771.49.0.846198686889.issue15960@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm not against making this change, but I'm curious - why would a handler do clean-up I/O in its release() method (which is just for releasing the I/O lock) where it could just as easily override the close() method to do the same thing? It seems like programmer error to be doing any I/O in a handler after close() is called on it. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月18日 14:49:31 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, ncoghlan |
| 2012年09月18日 14:49:31 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1347979771.49.0.846198686889.issue15960@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月18日 14:49:31 | vinay.sajip | link | issue15960 messages |
| 2012年09月18日 14:49:30 | vinay.sajip | create |
|