Message170638
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
amaury.forgeotdarc, jcea, pitrou, sbt, skrah |
| Date |
2012年09月18日.08:33:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1347957234.96.0.969752587733.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
So the problem is that readinto(view) might result in several references
to view? I don't think that can be solved on the memoryview side.
One could do:
view = PyMemoryView_FromObject(b);
// Lie about writability
((PyMemoryViewObject *)view)->view.readonly = 0;
[...]
Then the view owns a reference to the bytes object. But that does not
solve the problem that writable memoryviews based on a readonly object
might be hanging around. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月18日 08:33:55 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, sbt |
| 2012年09月18日 08:33:54 | skrah | set | messageid: <1347957234.96.0.969752587733.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月18日 08:33:54 | skrah | link | issue15903 messages |
| 2012年09月18日 08:33:53 | skrah | create |
|