Message 170629 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	pitrou
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, jcea, pitrou, sbt, skrah
Date	2012年09月17日.23:14:26
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1347923687.67.0.596836727774.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> The bytes object cannot "leak" so, as you say, checking that refcount > is pointless. But the view might "leak", and since it does not own a > reference to the base object we have a problem: we can't deallocate the > bytes object for fear of breaking the view. Indeed, that's a problem (but your patch does deallocate the bytes object). It's quite fishy, I'm not sure how to solve the issue cleanly. Stefan, do you have an idea?

Content

> The bytes object cannot "leak" so, as you say, checking that refcount
> is pointless. But the view might "leak", and since it does not own a
> reference to the base object we have a problem: we can't deallocate the 
> bytes object for fear of breaking the view.
Indeed, that's a problem (but your patch does deallocate the bytes object).
It's quite fishy, I'm not sure how to solve the issue cleanly. Stefan, do you have an idea?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年09月17日 23:14:47	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, skrah, sbt
2012年09月17日 23:14:47	pitrou	set	messageid: <1347923687.67.0.596836727774.issue15903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年09月17日 23:14:26	pitrou	link	issue15903 messages
2012年09月17日 23:14:26	pitrou	create

homepage