Message170336
| Author |
ethan.furman |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, cvrebert, docs@python, eric.araujo, ethan.furman, ncoghlan, python-dev, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2012年09月11日.18:01:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<504F802A.30002@stoneleaf.us> |
| In-reply-to |
<504F7F73.3070707@stoneleaf.us> |
| Content |
Ethan Furman wrote:
> Ethan Furman added the comment:
>
> R. David Murray wrote:
>> I rewrote the section a bit differently than you did in your patch...if you think my changes are not an improvement please let me know.
>
> This line is incorrect:
>
> A class which defines its own :meth:`__hash__` that explicitly raises a
> :exc:`TypeError` would be incorrectly identified as hashable by an
> ``isinstance(obj, collections.Hashable)`` call.
>
> It should be "would not be correctly identified as hashable".
>
> Otherwise, looks great.
Argh. Nevermind! It all looks good. :) |
|