Message170255
| Author |
chris.jerdonek |
| Recipients |
asvetlov, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, r.david.murray, sbt, terry.reedy, v+python |
| Date |
2012年09月11日.01:01:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1347325319.94.0.99508281558.issue15629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> You should also see if there are more doctest-safe or more doctest-unsafe tests, and mark the ones in the smallest group.
Running the doctests for all .rst files in the Doc/ directory using the latest patch gave me the following:
299 tests [files] OK.
126 tests failed
(and 6 that I manually skipped)
Following the suggestion above from Ezio, we should have a doc file marker to skip a file as opposed to including a file. This means that doctests would be included by default, which I think would be a good way to go. How do people feel about something like the following for a marker?
.. doctest-skip-file (to distinguish from skipping an individual test)
Or perhaps (to go with something like Nick's original suggestion)
.. doctest-unsafe |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月11日 01:02:00 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients:
+ chris.jerdonek, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, v+python, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, asvetlov, docs@python, sbt |
| 2012年09月11日 01:01:59 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1347325319.94.0.99508281558.issue15629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月11日 01:01:59 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue15629 messages |
| 2012年09月11日 01:01:58 | chris.jerdonek | create |
|