Message170010
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
alexkon, asvetlov, docs@python, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年09月07日.19:47:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1347047228.12.0.113779159957.issue15863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I do not think there should be references between the Python 2 docs and Python 3 docs. But within each, I think it ok to have exceptional multiple references for what is, I believe, a unique situation: a security fix that required a new feature. Do it however seems most graceful.
My first thought was that someone seeing "added in 2.6.8' should know that adding a feature in a bugfix release is almost never done, hence it might not be in 2.7.0. But then I remembered that this fix is mainly for web sites, and the reader selecting which Python versions to use might not be a Python programmer. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月07日 19:47:08 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, asvetlov, docs@python, alexkon |
| 2012年09月07日 19:47:08 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1347047228.12.0.113779159957.issue15863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月07日 19:47:07 | terry.reedy | link | issue15863 messages |
| 2012年09月07日 19:47:07 | terry.reedy | create |
|