Message169940
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Robin.Schreiber, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, loewis |
| Date |
2012年09月06日.20:50:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1346964603.67.0.430361240082.issue15870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> see how type_new also computes the metaclass from the base classes.
As you can see from my first message, I originally considered PyType_FromSpecEx(PyObject *meta, PyType_Spec *spec) without bases. (In fact I was unaware of the recent addition of PyType_FromSpecWithBases.) Maybe the original signature makes more sense than the one in the patch. Explicitly setting a metaclass is most useful for the most basic type. On the other hand, a fully general function may eventually replace both PyType_FromSpec and PyType_FromSpecWithBases for most uses. |
|