Message169757
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn, belopolsky, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年09月03日.12:38:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1346675898.83.0.337835500195.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Small nitpick: multi-dimensional hashing wasn't really accidental,
it was perfectly aligned with the previous statically typed equality
definition.
When I suggested PyBuffer_Hash = hash(obj.tobytes()) on python-dev for
non-contiguous and multi-dimensional arrays, I got a +1 from Raymond
(which I now see was a private message).
I don't see what could possibly be ill-defined about using the
tobytes() definition for ND-arrays. In all places memoryview now
uses the logical array, which is displayed by tolist().
Leaving aside static typing, both the previous and the new equality
definitions regarded C and Fortran arrays with the same list outputs
as equal. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月03日 12:38:18 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, meador.inge, Alexander.Belopolsky, python-dev, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn |
| 2012年09月03日 12:38:18 | skrah | set | messageid: <1346675898.83.0.337835500195.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月03日 12:38:18 | skrah | link | issue15814 messages |
| 2012年09月03日 12:38:17 | skrah | create |
|