Message169655
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn, belopolsky, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年09月01日.18:04:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1346522474.3380.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<20120901172023.GA16365@sleipnir.bytereef.org> |
| Content |
> Could we perhaps take a small poll? My own vote is:
>
> 1) Allow bytes hashing at all: +0.5
+10. The buffer() object in 2.x was hashable, and a very important use
case of memoryview is replacing buffer().
> 2) If 1) is allowed, then also non-contiguous hashing is allowed: +1
> 3) Allow multi-dimensional hashing: +-0
I don't care about these. I kind of agree with Martin that hashability
should be motivated by an use case, so -0. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月01日 18:04:54 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, belopolsky, scoder, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, skrah, meador.inge, Alexander.Belopolsky, python-dev, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn |
| 2012年09月01日 18:04:54 | pitrou | link | issue15814 messages |
| 2012年09月01日 18:04:53 | pitrou | create |
|