Message169636
| Author |
skrah |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn, belopolsky, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年09月01日.14:24:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1346509461.82.0.800548746043.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Martin v. L??wis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Why be more permissive than necessary? -0 on the committed version;
> it should IMO further restrict it to 1D contiguous byte arrays.
Does "byte arrays" include 'b' and 'c' or just 'B'? I don't see a reason
to allow 'B' but not the others.
I'm +-0 on allowing multi-dimensional arrays, but it would be
odd to restrict hashing to contiguous arrays:
>>> b = b'abcdefhhijkl'
>>> m = memoryview(b)
>>> b[::-1]
b'lkjihhfedcba'
>>> bytes(m[::-1])
b'lkjihhfedcba'
>>> hash(b[::-1]) == hash(m[::-1])
True
My reasoning was: If non-contiguous arrays are allowed (and I think they
should be), why not allow multi-dimensional arrays, too?
The definition hash(m) == hash(m.tobytes()) is pretty straightforward. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年09月01日 14:24:21 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, scoder, vstinner, christian.heimes, Arfrever, meador.inge, python-dev, Dag.Sverre.Seljebotn |
| 2012年09月01日 14:24:21 | skrah | set | messageid: <1346509461.82.0.800548746043.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年09月01日 14:24:21 | skrah | link | issue15814 messages |
| 2012年09月01日 14:24:21 | skrah | create |
|