Message169404
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年08月29日.18:01:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1346263077.3344.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1346262885.95.0.511946076589.issue15814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I think the proper solution is to make memoryview objects unhashable.
Disagreed. If memoryviews are to be bytes-like objects they should be
hashable (at least when readonly).
> Any other approach will have flaws of some kind.
Not more so than equality between memoryviews. |
|