Message168758
| Author |
bethard |
| Recipients |
bethard, eric.smith, gcbirzan, jeffknupp, kalt, python-dev, r.david.murray, wt |
| Date |
2012年08月21日.11:54:56 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1345550097.95.0.835034356687.issue13922@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
@gcbirzan: Could you please open up a new issue? The current issue is fixed - it's just that the fix caused a new issue.
I would say that the `args` parameter was never intended to be anything but a list, so currently there's a documentation bug since that isn't stated explicitly anywhere. (But certainly the tests only test for lists, not any other sequences.)
Adding support for stuff other than lists feels more like a feature request, but given that it apparently worked by accident before, I guess we need to treat it as a bug. Probably the fix for that bug needs to have a ton of tests that check whether tuples work in all the various ways that parse_args is used. |
|