Message168368
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
loewis, ncoghlan, skrah, teoliphant |
| Date |
2012年08月16日.10:30:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1345113022.81.0.173485184838.issue15625@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I wouldn't change the export formats used for the 'u' typecode at all in 3.4 - I'd add new typecodes to array that match any new struct format characters and are exported accordingly. 'u' would *never* become a formally defined struct character, instead lingering in the array module as a legacy of the narrow/wide build distinction.
And good point that U would need to match UCS-4 to be consistent with NumPy. Perhaps we can just add 'U' in 3.4 and forget about UCS-2 entirely? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年08月16日 10:30:22 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, loewis, teoliphant, skrah |
| 2012年08月16日 10:30:22 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1345113022.81.0.173485184838.issue15625@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年08月16日 10:30:22 | ncoghlan | link | issue15625 messages |
| 2012年08月16日 10:30:22 | ncoghlan | create |
|