Message168069
| Author |
v+python |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, r.david.murray, sbt, v+python |
| Date |
2012年08月13日.02:26:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1344824801.65.0.584050534154.issue15629@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Another idea would be to make a notation that looks exactly* like doctests for documentation purposes, but that doctest would not run. Then, non-runnable doctests could be skipped, and runnable ones could be run. This would help keep the runnable code in the documentation validated, but would be on a test-by-test basis, rather than file by file. |
|