Message167837
| Author |
ezio.melotti |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan |
| Date |
2012年08月09日.21:35:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1344548134.7.0.850848445373.issue15611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think you should better define the goal of this new section.
How would people use this information?
* If it's just to know what developers are on the core-mentorship list, I think it's a bit pointless, especially because not all of them might want to be listed or they might be listed and not following it actively;
* If it's to know if someone you see on core-mentorship is a core developer, the full list of developers is a better way to check, since it contains all the names;
* If (as Nick's message seems to suggest) the goal is to find people willing to be added to the nosy list of issues about orphaned modules, then the "core mentors" header is a bit misleading because people might be on core-mentorship but they might not want to be added to issues (or vice versa);
The last goal makes some amount of sense, but it's somewhat orthogonal with the core-mentorship ML. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年08月09日 21:35:34 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients:
+ ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, chris.jerdonek |
| 2012年08月09日 21:35:34 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1344548134.7.0.850848445373.issue15611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年08月09日 21:35:34 | ezio.melotti | link | issue15611 messages |
| 2012年08月09日 21:35:33 | ezio.melotti | create |
|