Message167432
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Axel.Wegen, Laurent.Mazuel, belopolsky, d0ugal, docs@python, draghuram, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, ggenellina, giampaolo.rodola, hynek, ijmorlan, jokoala, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, ysj.ray, zooko |
| Date |
2012年08月04日.19:28:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1344108503.77.0.969247417693.issue13498@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I *want* it to be the default, since I think that is the typical use case, but the existing default behavior means that such a backward incompatible change would not be acceptable for exactly the reason you state. So yes, I want it as a new flag. ("exist_really_ok", he says with tongue in cheek.) I haven't given much thought to the API, but perhaps there could be a value for the umask that means "don't care"? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年08月04日 19:28:24 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, zooko, belopolsky, ggenellina, draghuram, giampaolo.rodola, ijmorlan, eric.araujo, Arfrever, ysj.ray, docs@python, Laurent.Mazuel, hynek, jokoala, Axel.Wegen, d0ugal |
| 2012年08月04日 19:28:23 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1344108503.77.0.969247417693.issue13498@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年08月04日 19:28:23 | r.david.murray | link | issue13498 messages |
| 2012年08月04日 19:28:22 | r.david.murray | create |
|