Message166866
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
jkloth, mark.dickinson |
| Date |
2012年07月30日.08:17:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1343636238.31.0.544993109371.issue15495@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
How many extra warnings do you get by adding these flags (e.g., just by doing 'export CFLAGS= ...' before building)? It might be useful to see a sampling of those warnings.
The addition of these flags should be conditional on gcc's version being >= 4.3: gcc 4.2 apparently has a different meaning for -Wconversion (to do with implicit conversions when passing function arguments), and generates crazy numbers of warnings on my OS X 10.6 machine (which comes with gcc 4.2).
Why '-Wno-sign-conversion'? Is fixing all the places that have implicit sign conversions a reasonable goal, or are there just too many of those? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年07月30日 08:17:18 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, jkloth |
| 2012年07月30日 08:17:18 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1343636238.31.0.544993109371.issue15495@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年07月30日 08:17:17 | mark.dickinson | link | issue15495 messages |
| 2012年07月30日 08:17:17 | mark.dickinson | create |
|