Message166765
| Author |
nedbat |
| Recipients |
bkabrda, chris.jerdonek, ncoghlan, nedbat, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年07月29日.14:38:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1343572691.15.0.479985124263.issue14803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Chris:
The real problem is that it isn't the "test suite" that spawns the processes, the tests invoke product code, and the product code spawns Python. So modifying the Python-spawning really means modifying the product code to do something different under coverage, which most developers (rightfully) won't want to do.
My preference is not to assume a particular style of spawning subprocesses, since coverage.py tried quite hard to be applicable to any Python project. |
|