Message166055
| Author |
piotr.dobrogost |
| Recipients |
aronacher, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gpolo, mark.dickinson, nestor, piotr.dobrogost, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年07月21日.19:52:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1342900359.35.0.678764299624.issue10091@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I totally agree with Eric's statement that "Set literals, a new feature indeed, have been backported to 2.7 and 3.1. The lack of support in ast.literal_eval is arguably a bug."
I came here from "set literal syntax support in Python 2.7" question at Stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/q/6078262/95735) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年07月21日 19:52:39 | piotr.dobrogost | set | recipients:
+ piotr.dobrogost, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, aronacher, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, nestor |
| 2012年07月21日 19:52:39 | piotr.dobrogost | set | messageid: <1342900359.35.0.678764299624.issue10091@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年07月21日 19:52:38 | piotr.dobrogost | link | issue10091 messages |
| 2012年07月21日 19:52:38 | piotr.dobrogost | create |
|