Message165207
| Author |
Carl.Nobile |
| Recipients |
Carl.Nobile, cdwave, edevil, jjlee, nikratio, nnorwitz, orsenthil, rharris, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年07月10日.22:14:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAGQqDQLa-=sZfbNVBADwt5Y60_epZu=vWnd_it7=KnGpEww+5w@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1341955946.51.0.672592918452.issue1346874@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Yes, exactly. I was not the one who posted the original bug report, but I
found it when I ran into the same problem. I was not exactly sure if the
original poster had the same issues as I had. I do know that my fix to the
code eliminated some code making the code a bit simpler. I could try to dig
up my fix and send it to you if you want.
~Carl
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, André Cruz <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> André Cruz <andre@cabine.org> added the comment:
>
> As far as I can see, the patch does add some documentation changes. What
> exactly is missing?
>
> As for the bug, if I understood correctly, what you are saying is that
> when "ignore_continue" is True, and the server sends a 100 Continue
> response, the code will continue to try to read data from the server even
> though none is expected, is that right?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874>
> _______________________________________
> |
|