Message165196
| Author |
Carl.Nobile |
| Recipients |
Carl.Nobile, cdwave, edevil, jjlee, nikratio, nnorwitz, orsenthil, rharris, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2012年07月10日.16:20:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAGQqDQ+gMNKfbMAJLh5P=griYuH0NP1pEJqXaxgTV0XGe_6PjA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1341936907.28.0.113674432991.issue1346874@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
I was told some time ago that it was documentation changes. And, if I
remember correctly CONTINUE (100) was not ignored, it was actually broken.
Data was being read from stdin when a CONTINUE was received and this should
never happen based on RFC 2616, because there will never be any data to
read.
~Carl
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, André Cruz <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> André Cruz <andre@cabine.org> added the comment:
>
> Can anyone confirm what is missing for this patch to be committed?
>
> Is it just test and documentation changes or is something wrong with the
> code changes as well?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +edevil
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874>
> _______________________________________
> |
|