Message164251
| Author |
hynek |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, hynek, jcea, larry, loewis, mrts, ncoghlan, neologix, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, rosslagerwall, schmir, tarek, teamnoir |
| Date |
2012年06月28日.12:33:03 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4FEC4EFC.2010400@ox.cx> |
| In-reply-to |
<1340884903.64.0.698523145315.issue4489@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I'm pretty busy right now, please open a ticket for listdir.
done
> _rmtree_safe_fd could remove the directory just after the recursive step using the parent's dirfd. Of course you'd also have to add a rmdir for the very-tippy-top after the original call in shutil.rmtree too. But this would prevent the malicious user from even removing empty directories.
Okay I looked into it and it seems okay. IIRC, when Martin wrote the
code (and I the fwalk version before), there was no known fd-based rmdir
function. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年06月28日 12:33:04 | hynek | set | recipients:
+ hynek, loewis, georg.brandl, jcea, ncoghlan, pitrou, larry, schmir, tarek, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, mrts, neologix, teamnoir, rosslagerwall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen |
| 2012年06月28日 12:33:03 | hynek | link | issue4489 messages |
| 2012年06月28日 12:33:03 | hynek | create |
|