Message163977
| Author |
vinay.sajip |
| Recipients |
Kazutaka.Morita, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2012年06月25日.15:06:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340636779.93.0.171189477395.issue15179@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Why should the socket need closing if the connect fails? This seems a flawed contract; either connect() should work (in which case the socket will need closing when it's finished with) or it should fail, not connect and not require a close call (as it isn't connected). Could this be a problem with eventlet? One could argue that the leak is actually in whatever implements socket.connect in this case (presumably eventlet). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年06月25日 15:06:20 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, Kazutaka.Morita |
| 2012年06月25日 15:06:19 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1340636779.93.0.171189477395.issue15179@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年06月25日 15:06:19 | vinay.sajip | link | issue15179 messages |
| 2012年06月25日 15:06:19 | vinay.sajip | create |
|