Message163878
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev |
| Date |
2012年06月25日.00:40:02 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340584804.25.0.773664455441.issue14657@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Given Antoine's other change to the build process to fix the bootstrapping problem, I'm OK with leaving it up to anyone hacking on _bootstrap.py to remember that they need to run make if they want the interpreter to see any of their changes.
Unlike the C accelerator cases, it's not possible for the two implementations to get out of sync on the buildbots, so running the tests twice would just be a convenience change for anyone hacking on _bootstrap.py rather than being needed for correctness.
That said, if someone created a new issue and posted a patch to run the tests twice, I wouldn't object - a classic case of +0 :) |
|