Message163759
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, alexis, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, pitrou, tarek |
| Date |
2012年06月24日.10:26:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340533354.3390.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to |
<1340504721.31.0.903509168044.issue15147@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> The sysconfig module was modified (and sysconfig.cfg was introduced)
> to serve the needs of the resource system (install_data putting files
> into system-configured locations and packaging.database finding them);
> one of the thousand things mentioned in the "Status of Packaging"
> thread was an opinion by PJE that this was a bad choice, and even if I
> disagree (being a Debian guy and all :), a PEP would be in order to
> decide on such a big new functionality. Should these changes be
> reverted too? (I’d think yes.)
What is sysconfig.cfg?
Keeping sysconfig is ok IMO. |
|