homepage

> But at the heart of the matter, I see no benefit to exposing Python
> developers to the idiosyncrasies of poor C API design. I feel strongly that
> one way Python becomes "pythonic" is that it aims for the convenience of the
> programmer--not the language designer and not the implementer. The Python
> calling convention is far more flexible than the C calling convention. We
> should put it to good use here.
I agree.
However, I think Martin is a proponent of the "thin wrapper" approach,
so it'd be nice to have his input on this.
I personally like the change, except for `flags` argument collapsing. Imagine what mmap's prototype would look like if we used list of optional arguments instead of a flag...