Message163464
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Yury.Selivanov, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, larry, neologix, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年06月22日.19:22:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340392973.52.0.894129608243.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> > http://bugs.python.org/review/14626/diff/5182/Doc/library/os.rst#newcode1210
> Doc/library/os.rst:1210: using it will raise a
> :exc:`NotImplementedError`.
> Same as above: would it make sense to ignore the arg if follow_symlinks
> is not supported, but the fact is irrelevant because the system doesn't
> support symlinks at all?
And what if the system supports symlink and doesn't support
at-functions, follow_symlinks=False and file is not symlink. Should it
be NotImplementedError? |
|