Message163198
| Author |
sbt |
| Recipients |
kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, python-dev, sbt, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年06月19日.18:08:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340129334.79.0.81958754259.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
1.41 Generic emulations of the pthread_cond_* API using
1.42 earlier Win32 functions can be found on the Web.
1.43 The following read can be edificating (or not):
1.44 http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~schmidt/win32-cv-1.html
1.45 +
1.46 + See also
1.47 */
1.45 and 1.46 should be removed?
Also I would not recommend the win32-cv-1.html page as "edificating" (edifying?). The implementations all either suffer from the same stolen wakeup issue or are broken.*
* win32-cv-1.html assumes that SignalObjectAndWait() is atomic and that PulseEvent() is guaranteed to wake a waiting thread if there is one -- but Microsoft's documentation now admits that both these assumptions are false. |
|