Message163159
| Author |
christian.heimes |
| Recipients |
Jon.Oberheide, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev |
| Date |
2012年06月19日.13:10:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340111416.71.0.996682452107.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I've increased the priority to "release blocker".
Reason:
We should come to an agreement how to handle the issue. In particular we must not pronounce something as secure that isn't secure.
Options:
1) Remove the function.
2) Rename the function to a more sensible name and provide a bytes only implementation. I like the Jon's proposal and suggest timingsafe_compare().
2b) optionally create a C implementation as it's much easier to check C code for timing issues. |
|