Message163130
| Author |
Sam.Rushing |
| Recipients |
Sam.Rushing, eric.araujo, jcea, nadeem.vawda |
| Date |
2012年06月19日.01:00:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1340067661.14.0.749379698889.issue14684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I think other than the disagreement about whether the dictionary constructor arg should be a buffer object, it's good to go.
To restate my position: the need is for an immutable string of bytes, and that's exactly what PyBytes_Type is for. I see no advantage to allowing a buffer object, which will require extra code to check that it is both a buffer object and set to be readonly. I believe the argument for aesthetics does not apply, as the constant dictionary constructor argument is a morally different kind of parameter, comparable to (say) the compression level.
You folks are of course welcome to change it, though. 8^) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年06月19日 01:01:01 | Sam.Rushing | set | recipients:
+ Sam.Rushing, jcea, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo |
| 2012年06月19日 01:01:01 | Sam.Rushing | set | messageid: <1340067661.14.0.749379698889.issue14684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年06月19日 01:01:00 | Sam.Rushing | link | issue14684 messages |
| 2012年06月19日 01:00:59 | Sam.Rushing | create |
|