Message163063
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
Ramchandra Apte, eric.araujo, michael.foord, ncoghlan, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2012年06月17日.12:30:45 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1339936246.51.0.17749590433.issue14215@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm expecting the "pep2pyramid.py" part to change at the very least.
However, back on topic, I actually hit the limits of my knowledge of the PEP build process reading that script.
As near as I can tell, PEP 0 should have the same "title" information as is available for the other PEPs. It does appear the individual PEPs and the index do use differently templates though, so that may be the source of the discrepancy. |
|