Message 162859 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	fijall
Recipients	arigo, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date	2012年06月15日.07:50:29
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAK5idxRFPHzdKCx0T+ifYwcwxApHTv35_WGVVK-Ken8AXk17+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<4FDAE87B.30908@v.loewis.de>

Content
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org>wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > > > To repeat, the specific feature being proposed for retention is: > > To repeat, no use case has been demonstrated for that function. It > has been added because it was fun to write, not because it is useful. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue15061> > _______________________________________ > Is comparing passwords against a secure one not useful?

Content

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment:
>
> > To repeat, the specific feature being proposed for retention is:
>
> To repeat, no use case has been demonstrated for that function. It
> has been added because it was fun to write, not because it is useful.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15061>
> _______________________________________
>
Is comparing passwords against a secure one not useful?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年06月15日 07:50:29	fijall	set	recipients: + fijall, loewis, arigo, ncoghlan, pitrou, christian.heimes, hynek
2012年06月15日 07:50:29	fijall	link	issue15061 messages
2012年06月15日 07:50:29	fijall	create

homepage