Message162846
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
arigo, christian.heimes, fijall, hynek, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date |
2012年06月15日.06:31:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4FDAD6DD.7010102@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1339676785.66.0.148848146387.issue15061@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 14.06.2012 14:26, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>> It's either secure or it's not.
>
> I don't think that's true. By that reasoning, Python is not secure so
> there's no point in fixing crashes or providing a hashlib module.
The proper statement is "It's either time-independent or it's not".
This *is* a binary state (I agree that being secure is not a binary
state). |
|