Message162786
| Author |
techtonik |
| Recipients |
ajaksu2, belopolsky, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, l0nwlf, mihaic, poolie, r.david.murray, techtonik |
| Date |
2012年06月14日.13:36:03 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAPkN8xJKgu11o790WbmDGiTcDXp3J7z0KcLd-Tt=4k_Y6H7xdw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1279061543.77.0.750672834209.issue7584@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> I am still -1 on adding specialized formatting methods to the datetime class. I think this should be done in specialized modules.
No problem - add "formats" module and I'll be happy.
>On the other hand, datetime module should provide facilities to easily implement such methods and there does not seem to be a good solution for implementing locale independent formats. I would like to consider the idea of adding datetime.cstrftime() which provides formatting equivalent to datetime.strftime() in "C" locale. Another feature that will be needed to implement rfcformat, would be a GNU date style "%:z" code.
If there is no best solution then the best out worse solutions is much
much better - provided that an appropriate explanation is available
for the users. |
|