Message162702
| Author |
kristjan.jonsson |
| Recipients |
kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年06月13日.09:44:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1339580667.06.0.592392257123.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
While I'm confident about the correctness of this implementation (it ́s in production use right now) I ́d like comments on the architecture.
- Are people comfortable with the notion of an include file with an inline implementation of portable condition variables like this?
- Martin voiced concerns over having a _future_ compatible implementation in there with Windows 7 support only. I thought it cool to have around, since it strenghtens the "portability" design of the pattern.
- Names of types/apis. Am I doing it right? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年06月13日 09:44:27 | kristjan.jonsson | set | recipients:
+ kristjan.jonsson, loewis, paul.moore, pitrou, vstinner |
| 2012年06月13日 09:44:27 | kristjan.jonsson | set | messageid: <1339580667.06.0.592392257123.issue15038@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年06月13日 09:44:26 | kristjan.jonsson | link | issue15038 messages |
| 2012年06月13日 09:44:25 | kristjan.jonsson | create |
|