Message162651
| Author |
James.Kyle |
| Recipients |
James.Kyle, ronaldoussoren |
| Date |
2012年06月11日.23:50:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1339458607.52.0.58564390554.issue15048@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Am I missing something or were the problems delineated in issue #4865 solvable by simply sys.path.append("/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages")?
What would the process be for reopening this issue for discussion?
I'm not sure this is the right way to address this. For example, what if other *nix distros started adding their own custom "common" paths, would Python begin implemented these distro specific deviations from standard behavior?
In my honest opinion, there's an expectation of package isolation in independent python installs. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2012年06月11日 23:50:07 | James.Kyle | set | recipients:
+ James.Kyle, ronaldoussoren |
| 2012年06月11日 23:50:07 | James.Kyle | set | messageid: <1339458607.52.0.58564390554.issue15048@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2012年06月11日 23:50:06 | James.Kyle | link | issue15048 messages |
| 2012年06月11日 23:50:05 | James.Kyle | create |
|