Message162584
| Author |
loewis |
| Recipients |
doerwalter, eric.araujo, lemburg, loewis, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2012年06月10日.11:26:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<4FD4846D.3010509@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to |
<1339326022.18692.20.camel@raxxla> |
| Content |
>> U+FFFE is documented as representing an undefined mapping,
>
> Yes, using U+FFFE for representing an undefined mapping in strings is
> normal, the question was about string subclasses.
What is the question? U+FFFE also represents an undefined mapping in
string subclasses.
> And if we will correct it for string subclasses, how far we go any
> further?
This is a single issue, a single bug. If the bug is fixed, it is fixed.
No need to go further (unless there is another bug somewhere). |
|