Message 162509 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	Buck.Golemon
Recipients	Buck.Golemon, ankitoshniwal
Date	2012年06月07日.23:55:12
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1339113312.89.0.803896569173.issue15009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Well i think the real issue is that you can't enumerate the protocals that "use netloc". All protocols are allowed to have a netloc. the smb: protocol certainly does, but it's not in the list. The core issue is that smb:/foo and smb:///foo are different urls, and should be represented differently when split. The /// form has a netloc, it's just the empty-string. The single-slash form has no netloc, so I propose that urlsplit('smb:/foo') return SplitResult(scheme='smb', netloc=None, path='/foo', query='', fragment='')

Content

Well i think the real issue is that you can't enumerate the protocals that "use netloc". All protocols are allowed to have a netloc. the smb: protocol certainly does, but it's not in the list.
The core issue is that smb:/foo and smb:///foo are different urls, and should be represented differently when split. The /// form has a netloc, it's just the empty-string. The single-slash form has no netloc, so I propose that urlsplit('smb:/foo') return SplitResult(scheme='smb', netloc=None, path='/foo', query='', fragment='')

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012年06月07日 23:55:13	Buck.Golemon	set	recipients: + Buck.Golemon, ankitoshniwal
2012年06月07日 23:55:12	Buck.Golemon	set	messageid: <1339113312.89.0.803896569173.issue15009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012年06月07日 23:55:12	Buck.Golemon	link	issue15009 messages
2012年06月07日 23:55:12	Buck.Golemon	create

homepage