Message162332
| Author |
neologix |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, lemburg, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, vstinner |
| Date |
2012年06月05日.07:01:32 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAH_1eM1=9gc7+5hfVXbwgpvDp-x4MGnCtSFWsbztejZDk2dNiA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1338851391.47.0.878766695172.issue14428@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> I'm closing again this issue.
>
> @neologix: Please open a new issue if you disagree with me on the definition of "seconds" for time.process_time().
I won't reopen, but I still disagree with your definition.
process_time() returns second, as does the Unix 'time' command return:
"""
$ time sleep 1
real 0m1.014s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
"""
AFAICT, process_time() returns user + sys. Since the unit of those two
fields are second, the value returned is in second. I doesn't include
time spent in 'S'/'D'/whatever time, but it's still seconds. |
|